AAAI 2025 投稿記と注意事項

Below are some notes compiled by lz for those who want to submit; feel free to discuss together.

Note: all deadlines are “anywhere on earth” (UTC‑12)
August 7, 2024
Abstracts due at 11:59 PM UTC‑12
August 15, 2024
Full papers due at 11:59 PM UTC‑12
August 19, 2024
Supplementary material and code due by 11:59 PM UTC‑12

Submission Guidelines

Brief Guidelines

  • Submit on openreview.
  • All author names must be submitted by 7:59 AM Beijing Time on August 8 (i.e., the Abstract deadline) (the official page lists the deadline as “anywhere on earth”), and cannot be changed afterwards.
  • Author order, contact author, and contact information cannot be modified after 7:59 AM on August 16 (i.e., the Full paper deadline).
  • According to AAAI policy, all author names must be added at the time of abstract registration, and the list of names as well as the order in which they appear cannot be changed after Full paper DDL.

Abstract Submission and Full Paper Submission

Abstract Submission

  • When submitting an abstract, provide the paper title and abstract content.
  • If the abstract is substantially changed after the Abstract deadline but before the Full paper deadline, the Program Chairs have the right to reject the paper outright. (Original: The Program Chairs also reserve the right to reject papers without review if they change their abstracts substantially between the abstract and final deadlines.)

Full Paper Submission

  • Double‑blind.
  • Use the AAAI25 template.
  • Submissions may consist of up to 7 pages of technical content plus additional pages solely for references (Additional pages for references only.).
  • No acknowledgments are allowed during the review stage.
  • During review, only a PDF is required; if accepted, the source code of the paper must be submitted.

Supplementary Material Submission

  • Supplementary material may include: (1) technical appendix; (2) multimedia; (3) code and data.

Multiple Submission Policy for Conferences or Journals

  • AAAI25 does not accept papers that are under review elsewhere or have already been published. Preprints on arXiv are allowed.

Reproducibility

  • When submitting a paper, ensure that the reproducibility checklist is completed. This includes how to reproduce the paper’s results.
  • Information related to reproducing experimental results described in the submission may be included in the main paper or the Code and Data Appendix, as appropriate.
  • Further technical details (proofs, descriptions of assumptions, algorithm pseudocode) may be included in the Technical Appendix.
  • When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include detailed information about each reproducibility criterion as part of their Technical Appendix.

Review Process

  • Phase 1
    • Each paper is assigned two reviewers; if both give negative reviews, the paper is rejected outright.
    • All other papers proceed to Phase 2.
  • Phase 2
    • Each paper will be assigned additional reviewers.
    • These reviewers cannot see the Phase 1 reviews before submitting their own.
  • During November 4–8, an author may comment on all reviewers.
  • Final results are announced on December 9.

Supplementary Materials

May include one or more of the following three types:

  • Technical Appendix
    • A PDF file containing additional supporting information.
  • Multimedia Appendix
    • A zip file that can contain images, videos, etc.
  • Code & Data Appendix
    • A zip file containing the code and data needed to reproduce the results (if the data is large, partial uploads are acceptable).

Paper Revision Guidelines

  • From after the Abstract deadline until the end of review, the following information cannot be changed:
    • contact author name and email
    • subject areas
  • From after the Abstract deadline until the Full paper deadline, the following information may be changed:
    • list of authors
    • author order
    • submitted paper
  • From after the Abstract deadline until the Full paper deadline, the following items can be edited, but should not be substantively changed:
    • title of the paper
    • abstract of the paper
  • From after the Full paper deadline until the Supplementary material deadline, the following may be modified:
    • technical appendix
    • multimedia appendix
    • code & data appendix
「いいね!」 2

I’m not handing it over to nips this year :rofl:

My aaai is probably dead :sweat_smile:

I’m also preparing to submit to AAAI; could the OP tell me how to submit the checklist this year?

I’m not really sure, it’s my first time voting :cry::cry::pleading_face::pleading_face:

If there are any new developments, I’ll reply here.

Wishing Menyou success

I got up at eight in the morning, did a few more experiments, and wrote the title and abstract. I sent them to the teacher and am waiting for feedback.

I wrote a PDF and placed it in the Supplementary material; this list doesn’t seem very important.

「いいね!」 1

Just talked with the teacher, didn’t expect the first author to actually be me :pleading_face: :pleading_face: :pleading_face: :pleading_face:

I had heard that some teachers like to grab the first author, but it seems I’m lucky to have a good teacher :pleading_face: :pleading_face: :pleading_face:

「いいね!」 4

You really crushed it… I’m exhausted.

Just curious which group op is in, and which track they submitted, meow

Damn, I thought the teacher would go home tonight. I originally said I’d revise the abstract tonight according to what was said in the afternoon meeting, but I ended up playing games. Just finished the game, and the teacher sent a message saying the abstract has been revised for me :pleading_face::pleading_face:

「いいね!」 1

Abstract submitted, by now the submission queue number has already reached 12000+, sigh

image
XJTU: trash

「いいね!」 1

Insert eye, is the Reproducibility Checklist mandatory?

The submission page specifically says to place it after the references; I want to know if this is required.

The official website says it must be completed, and it seems the new requirement indeed needs to follow references.

Alright, thanks.

Complete success

「いいね!」 1

I saw that the official website says it’s placed at the end of the appendix?

Definitely, in the past, not submitting the NeurIPS checklist would result in a desk reject, but NeurIPS has now changed it to a multiple‑choice format on the website.