上科大确实牛逼，但是因为 zz 原因现在也开始走回头路了。估计过几年就和南科大一样了，
有时候觉得中国的整个体系就是不断的当爹和认爹。。。想想《送东阳马生序》
一般流程：认爹->熬出头->当爹，另一种类似的模式是媳妇熬成婆 
改开以来的新儒家复兴又强化了这一点。
听不懂（确信）
细嗦
所有行业的 x 阀都是这个路线吧。。。狂飙里面的高启强也是这样
Humanities literacy is a rather abstract concept; it cannot be quantified by scores, or even by the degree of mastery of certain knowledge points. It mainly reflects your comprehensive ability to think about problems. People with good humanities literacy, when they speak or act, will inevitably make others feel a harmony with the external world and oneself, in terms of time and space.
The cultivation of this literacy mainly relies on one’s own habit of keen observation and enjoyment of thinking.
Can you discover problems in places that most people overlook or take for granted, keep those problems in mind for a long time, and later discover various forms of connections among the problems you have stored, generating new insights?
After identifying a problem, will you seek relevant books and materials to deepen your understanding? After gaining insight, are you willing to spend time organizing your thoughts and writing them down?
Quick fixes have no effect; any course eventually turns into rote memorization of knowledge points and endless practice, becoming what some students call a “liberal arts class.”
What humanities spirit does a so‑called “liberal arts class” have? What long‑standing issues of human spirit does it involve? To what extent does it inspire students’ thinking? Why is this thing called a “liberal arts class”?
7 Likes